Understanding the K1 Fiancee Visa Process

A K1 fiancee visa is a non-immigrant visa, which allows a foreign fiancà © or fiancà ©e (to simplify things, well use fiancee in the rest of this article) entry into the U.S. to marry a U.S. citizen. After marriage, an application is made for an adjustment of status for permanent residence. Obtaining the K1 visa is a multi-step process. First, the U.S. citizen files a petition to the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS). Once that is approved, the foreign fiancee will be allowed to complete the process to obtain a K1 visa. The foreign fiancee will provide additional documentation to the local U.S. embassy, attend a medical exam and visa interview. Filing the Fiancee Visa Petition The U.S. citizen (also knows as the petitioner) submits a petition for his or her foreign fiancee (also known as the beneficiary) to the USCIS.The petitioner submits Form I-129F Petition for Alien Fiance, along with Form G-325A Biographic Information, current fees and any required documentation to the appropriate USCIS Service Center.After a few weeks, the U.S. petitioner receives Form I-797, the first Notice of Action (NOA), from the USCIS acknowledging that the petition has been received.Depending on processing times, the petitioner then receives the second NOA from the USCIS acknowledging that the petition has been approved.The USCIS Service Center forwards the petition to the National Visa Center.The National Visa Center will process the file and run preliminary background checks on the beneficiary, then forward the approved petition to the beneficiarys embassy, as listed in the I-129F. Acquiring the Fiancee Visa The embassy receives the file and processes it locally.The embassy sends a package to the beneficiary that includes a checklist of documents that must be collected. The beneficiary will be instructed to send certain items back to the embassy immediately, while other items will be brought to the interview.The beneficiary will complete the checklist and any forms, include any documents required immediately and send the package back to the embassy.Once received, the consulate will send a letter to the beneficiary confirming the date and time of the visa interview.The beneficiary attends a medical interview.The beneficiary attends the visa interview. The interviewing officer will review all documents, ask questions, and make a decision on the case.If approved, the K1 fiancee visa will be issued that day or within the week, depending on the embassy. Activating the Fiancee Visa - Entering the U.S. The beneficiary will travel to the U.S. within 6 months of the K1 fiancee visa being issued.At the port of entry, an immigration officer will review the paperwork and finalize the visa, allowing the beneficiary to officially enter the U.S. First Steps - In the U.S. The K1 fiancee visa holder should apply for a Social Security number shortly after entering the U.S.The couple may now apply for a marriage license. Watch your timing! Most states apply a short waiting period between applying for the license and the marriage ceremony. Marriage The happy couple can now tie the knot! The marriage must take place within 90 days of activating the K1 visa. After Marriage If the foreign spouse is making a name change after marriage, take the new Social Security card and marriage certificate back to the Social Security Administration office to make a name change on the card. Adjustment of Status Now its time to apply for an Adjustment of Status (AOS) to become a permanent resident. It is important to file for the AOS before the K1 expiry date, otherwise, you will be out-of-status. If the foreign spouse wants to work in the U.S. or travel outside the U.S. before permanent resident status is granted, an Employment Authorization Document (EAD) and/or Advance Parole (AP) must be filed along with the AOS.

The Suffrage Movement Of The United States - 970 Words

The suffrage movement has entailed a long history of fighting for equality. Many organizations have developed, along with numerous campaigns and protests. The suffrage movement in the United States has dated back to the early 1840’s. During this time, Lucretia Mott and Elizabeth Cady Stanton organized the Seneca Falls Convention. Shortly after in 1951, Susan B. Anthony joined the two previously states activists and they founded the Women’s National Loyal League (WNLL) in the main attempt to abolish slavery and gain full citizenship for African Americans and women. Shortly after slavery was abolished, Anthony and Stanton formed the National Women Suffrage Association (NWSA), in 1869. This was delegated as being a more radical organization compared to the American Women Suffrage Association, founded by Lucy Stone, Julia Ward Howe, and Josephine Ruffin. However, by 1890 these two organizations decided they would be more effective if they joined to form just one prominent o rganization: the National American Women Suffrage Association (NAWSA) (Women’s Suffrage Movement). After several years of Stanton as president of NAWSA, Carrie Chapman Catt took over this position in 1900 and served as president until 1904 and again in 1915 through 1926. Catt is said to be the â€Å"driving force [behind] the organization† (Women’s Suffrage Movement). During her time as president, she made multiple contributions to encourage equality. According to Emily Droege, she quickly â€Å"became recognized asShow MoreRelatedWomen s Suffrage Movement Of The United States1341 Words   |  6 PagesBefore the 1700s, women in the United States didn’t receive any good education. When women did start to get good education, they started to get more into politics and started asking questions about why couldn’t they vote among other things. The year 1948, marked the birth of women suffrage movement when the first women’s right convention was held in Seneca Falls. The convention was organized by Lucretia Mott and Elizabeth Cady Stanton. Together wi th other women they declared that women should haveRead MoreThe Women s Suffrage Movement1553 Words   |  7 Pagesmen in terms of citizenship. Until this time, the only people who were allowed to vote in elections in the United States were male citizens. For over 100 years, women who were apart of the women’s suffrage movement fought for their right to vote, and faced many hardships and discrimination because of it. The American women’s suffrage movement was one of the most important political movements in history, and could not have been successful without the perseverance of many women over many years. AsRead MoreWomen s Rights During The Civil War1628 Words   |  7 PagesRight to Vote â€Å"While the word suffrage, derived from the Latin â€Å"Suffragium,† simply refers to the right to vote, the modern connotation specifically calls to mind the women’s suffrage movements of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. Part of the larger social movement of Women’s Rights and the fight for equality within patriarchal societies , the Women’s Suffrage Movement in the United States spans a seventy-two year period† (Dolton 31)The campaign for women’s suffrage began in the decades beforeRead MoreThe Fight for Rights!884 Words   |  4 PagesWomen had no rights compared to a man. Women had to fight for the rights which led to a change in the United States which last till today. For women in 1920s, the fight to acquire rights was called the women’s suffrage movement which on how they have rights, have to fight against a dissident to get the 19th amendment and how the suffrage movement influences them today from the suffragist de mands they acquired. With the arduous time women had trying to achieve the rights they demand they had to Read MoreWomen s Suffrage Movement : Lucretia Mott1399 Words   |  6 Pagesâ…ž 3/17/16 Women s Suffrage Movement: Lucretia Mott The Women s Suffrage Movement impacted the United States by giving women the right to have a voice and to finally be able to vote. Achieving the right to vote was the culminating event of the Women s Suffrage Movement. The Women s Suffrage Movement was also known as Women s Suffrage. The movement was the struggle for women to be able to vote and run for president. It was also closely linked to the women s right movement. In the mid 19th centuryRead MoreKansas Is Well Known For Its Effective Participation In1370 Words   |  6 Pagesits effective participation in the Women s Suffrage Movement. Early in the battle, the National American Woman Suffrage Association accepted Kansas as a liberal state that had a forward thinking mentality. In consideration of the state, the Association adopted the Kansas State flower, which is the sunflower as their image. The sunflower became a familiar sight and easily recognized symbol during suffrage campaigns. During the Women s Suffrage Movement, E ffie Graham was one of the many remarkableRead MorePaper On Writing And Thinking1425 Words   |  6 Pagescontemplate about their own social inequality within the government; therefore, a women’s movement was introduced to improve women’s roles in society. Elizabeth Cady Stanton and Lucretia Mott organized a Seneca Falls Convention that took place in New York from the 19th to the 20th of July in 1848. Many women and men showed up to the gathering to discuss the conditions and rights of women in the United States of America. During the convention, Elizabeth Cady Stanton and Lucretia Mott brought the issueRead MoreThe Struggle For Freedom And Equality1621 Words   |  7 Pagesof the time. The need for political freedom was a trend that started in the early 1840s and has not diminished since. The 19th Amendment gave women the right to vote in all elections. This granted all American women political freedom and started a movement to end prejudice against females. Before the amendment was ratified women were prohibited from jury service, public speaking, holding office, and attending college (Nineteenth Amendment 1). The 19th Amendment was one of the most influential turningRead MoreThe Suffrage Movement1320 Words   |  6 Pagesand the United States have encountered a number of drastic historical changes. As both men and women had the right to cast a vote in the most recent election, a little less than a century ago women did not have to right to vote. It was not until women throughout the United States came together to spark a suffrage movement that lead to congress passing the Nineteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution which provided women with the right to vote. The suffrage movement within the state of VirginiaRead MoreThe Women s Rights Movement1711 Words   |  7 PagesAmerican women the right to vote and it was ratified on August eighteen of 1920. If it was for the women’s suffrage movement which started in 1848 and ended in 1920 the nineteenth amendment would not have happened. Many strong, notable women were part of this movement. Sisters: The lives of America’s Suffragists by Jean Baker and Century of Struggle: The woman’s Rights Movement in the United States by Eleanor Flexner both cover the issues and the struggle that lead to giving women their right to vote

Comparative Analyse of America and European - MyAssignmenthelp.com

Question: Discuss about the Comparative Analyse of America and European. Answer: Wiretapping and eavesdropping happen to be one of the oldest means of peeking into someones private conversations. This technique though might appear helpful in order to investigate criminal cases; it often gives rise to ethical issues like how much freedom should be allowed to an individual about eavesdropping on someone elses conversation (Wang and Dai 2017). In addition, miscreants to peek into the private space of random people often misuse this technology. This essay is going to focus on the technology of wiretapping itself and the ethical issues that come into being because of this technology. Background: Wiretapping and eavesdropping serve as means of helping tools in criminal cases. Wiretapping consists of involving subtle means by which personal telephone conversations held by individuals can be heard and taped. This mainly helps in getting hold of secretive criminal conversations that can be harmful for the nation. This tool is used mainly the intelligence bureau department of various countries (Sharma and Rawat 2015). Electronic eavesdropping works mainly by inserting a bug inside premises, which are private in order to record the private conversations held there. It can also be done by wiring a government informant within whose earshot the record worthy conversation is taking place. These techniques are mainly used by law enforcement officials who to investigate organized crime and other counterespionage. This technology of wiretapping has been existing since the days of the introduction of wired conversations (Ritchie 2014). After the telegraphs and telephones were invented in the respective years of 1837 and 1876, this means of wiretapping and eavesdropping had been used by private investigators to get hold of private data for their clients (Ritchie 2014). Back then business personals also used this technology for corporate purposes. However, the rampant use of wiretapping by the law enforcement officials led to the introduction of the Prohibition Era, which in general disapproved the use of wired technology in order to eavesdrop peoples personal conversation no matter what purpose they served. Ethical issues those are associated with wiretapping and eavesdropping: By the term ethics, it is generally meant the philosophical study on matters of morality. In order to have a society in which people know what is good from bad and act accordingly, it is important to have a proper sense of ethics (Chonko 2016). Ethics is what that helps in building a healthy society with mutual sense of moral values. In this age of technology, with the innovation of each new technology it is quite natural that ethical issues will be aroused. The technology of incepting conversations through wires also posses certain ethical dilemmas. The first ethical issue that this kind of technology gives rise to is the issue related to the right to privacy (Chonko 2016). Each and every individual has their fundamental right to privacy and it is arguable that to what extent the government can cross that right. It has often been the case that a person is wiretapped simply out of suspicion but at the end it is proved that he is not guilty of any act that can be tagged as harmful. No w the ethical question of violating ones private space rises and the man can easily claim that his privacy has been violated unnecessarily and the government should be liable to answer him (Nill et al. 2015). Moreover, with the first and easy availability of technology, it is not only the government officials who are capable of using this technology. People who have no need for it other than peeking into other peoples personal loves often use it. For example, an over curious neighbour, who us good with technology can easy tape the phone of the person living adjacent to his house and listen to all the private conversations he has with his known people. This seriously violates the right to privacy and this is one of the major ethical issues that is associated with this technology (Nill et al. 2015). Act Utilitarianism and Wiretapping and Eavesdropping: The pioneers of the theory are John Stuart Mill and Jeremy Bentham (Crimmins 2017). The basic principle of the theory is that an act can only be considered good if the benefit done by it exceeds the amount of harm it causes. In a similar way, according to this theory an act will be considered bad if the overall harm caused by it exceeds the benefit that it brings in. This theory also proclaims that the utility of any given thing depends on the amount of happiness it brings on an individual or on a community (Crimmins 2017). The theory in its very basis starts with a hedonistic approach as the pioneer of the theory Bentham believed that human beings in their very nature happen to be hedonistic creatures. This implies he believed that if human beings are given an opportunity they will definitely reach out to seek pleasure and avoid pain in all the possible cases (Goetghebeur et al. 2015). This ethical theory if being viewed in the context of government monitoring a conversation as well as getting all the details out of it, there is bound to be both positive and negative consequences that will come out of the act. It can be of no doubt that the governmental surveillance act in most of the cases happen to bring out effects those are positive for the nation. For example, due to proper monitoring or wiretapping by the government, many nasty terrorist attacks may be prevented on time and lives of hundreds can be saved (Esau 2016). Also, if the government can wiretap the phone lines of proper people illegal business and trafficking can also be prevented. Wiretapping and eavesdropping can also help in solving international crimes as well. Till this point the act of wiretapping completely agrees with the ethical theory of Act Utilitarianism. However, there are points where the ethical issues rise and the act of wiretapping violates the theory of Act Utilitarianism. For example, it has often been the case where innocent citizens have been wrongly convicted of criminal suspicion and this has led to government bodies intruding into their private spaces and investigating via means of taping their personal phones as well as eavesdropping their personal conversations (Sengar, Wang and Iranmanesh, 2014). But, as the citizens were innocent such investigations led to nothing but only the harassment and eventual release of the convicted citizens. This is where this act of wiretapping violates the ethical rules set down by Act Utilitarianism. Because, the government detaining innocent citizens of the country or violating into their private spaces bring out no good for anyone and it is only harm that is being caused by such an act. In a number of cases wiretapping had led innocent people being put to jail and then released which is a severe ethical issue because though the detained citizens had been released without any charge, the psychological trauma that the detention might have caused remain irreparable. The essay can thus be concluded by stating that wiretapping and eavesdropping like any other technological innovation do violate certain ethical standards. However, the most alarming violation that can be caused is not the violation caused by government misjudgements but the ones that random people because of getting access to cheap technology can cause by peeking into the lives of random people. This issue cannot be eradicated or solved until people in general understand the ethical standards that must be followed in order for mass benefit. References: Chonko, L., 2016. Ethical theories. Arlington: University of Texas.Accessed,10, pp.1-5. Crimmins, J.E. ed., 2017.The Bloomsbury encyclopedia of utilitarianism. Bloomsbury Publishing. Esau, L.A., 2016. The Correlation between Wiretapping and Terrorism: A Comparative Analysis of American and European Societal Views on Government Surveillance.ILSA J. Int'l Comp. L.,23, p.55. Goetghebeur, M.M., Wagner, M., Bond, K. and Hofmann, B., 2015. Analysis Of Ethical Theories And Principles Embedded In Holistic Mcda: A Primer To Ethics-Based Appraisal Of Value In Healthcare.Value in Health,18(3), p.A101. Nill, A., Aalberts, R.J., Li, H. and Schibrowsky, J., 2015. New telecommunication technologies, big data and online behavioral advertising: do we need an ethical analysis?.Handbook on Ethics and Marketing, p.387. Ritchie, D.A., 2014.Doing oral history. Oxford University Press. Sengar, H., Wang, H. and Iranmanesh, S.A., 2014, March. Wiretap-proof: What they hear is not what you speak, and what you speak they do not hear. InProceedings of the 4th ACM conference on Data and application security and privacy(pp. 345-356). ACM. Sharma, R.K. and Rawat, D.B., 2015. Advances on security threats and countermeasures for cognitive radio networks: A survey.IEEE Communications Surveys Tutorials,17(2), pp.1023-1043. Wang, Q. and Dai, H.N., 2017, June. On modeling of eavesdropping behavior in underwater acoustic sensor networks. InA World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks (WoWMoM), 2017 IEEE 18th International Symposium on(pp. 1-3). IEEE.